by
First, Brendan Sorsby wanted to play college ball for Texas A&M. Then, he wanted to go straight to the NFL. And now, the NFL might force him out of the sport for a whole year.
The prized transfer quarterback has been through an absolute whirlwind once it was discovered that he repeatedly bet on sports while a collegiate athlete, including games involving his former team, Indiana. That whirlwind keeps spinning, and no one knows whether he’ll ever play football again.
It’s gotten that bad for Sorsby. So what gives?
We honestly don’t know, but let’s try to piece together this story. There are a lot of moving parts but let’s recap what’s happened first, then guess what could come next for the embattled QB.
NFL Decides Against A Supplemental Draft
In going straight to the NFL through the supplemental draft, Sorsby was looking for a lifeline. Welp, he thought wrong.
The league just decided against holding a supplemental draft this summer — shutting down Sorsby’s most realistic path to playing football in 2026. And get this, it sounds like it was a decision directly about Sorsby. Nothing else.
In a letter to Sorsby, NFL Management Council general counsel Larry Ferazani called the issues presented by his application “too significant” and tied them directly to the league’s integrity interests. That’s lawyer-speak for something pretty simple: the NFL wasn’t comfortable fast-tracking a player whose football career was derailed by gambling violations.
The NFL and its teams have made an absolute killing off sports betting app sponsorships and such. They are obviously in bed with the legal sports betting industry. But… they want to avoid the NBA betting scandals that involved players and coaches wagering on games. So far, the NFL has not had any similar issues, but Sorsby could’ve been the first.
What’s especially notable is how the league framed its decision. Ferazani pointed out that Sorsby’s application contained very little information about the NCAA investigation itself. The NFL also noted that Sorsby spent months fighting the NCAA’s ruling in court before suddenly pivoting toward the supplemental draft after those efforts fell apart. Reading between the lines, it feels like the NFL wanted more accountability from Sorsby.
Remember, we’re not talking about a player who accidentally violated some obscure NCAA bylaw. Sorsby admitted to placing thousands of online wagers. Thousands! He didn’t think it was an issue until after he was caught; it was only then that he checked into some “rehab” for problem gambling.
The most interesting part of the letter came at the end, however. The NFL didn’t slam the door completely. In fact, it specifically encouraged Sorsby to prepare for the 2027 NFL Draft instead. So they’re not completely shutting the door on the young QB. It’s more like they want this issue resolved before involving themselves with him.
NCAA Even Less Welcoming To Sorsby
Believe it or not, the NFL is less chill about accommodating Sorsby than the NCAA. Let’s just say things are spiraling in the collegiate athletics world over Sorsby.
Betting on sports, especially ones you’re partaking in, is as big of a crime as possible in the NCAA. A crime that’s punishable by a complete loss of eligibility, which Sorsby was facing before the supplemental draft.
That was, until a Texas judge granted him a temporary injunction — one that would’ve lasted months to settle. In that time, Sorsby would’ve been allowed to play for the Red Raiders despite the NCAA ruling him ineligible. That ruling turned this into a national story with massive implications across the college sports landscape.
As a result, the reaction was loud. The NCAA immediately appealed the ruling. The Big 12 filed its own legal action. Multiple athletic directors publicly blasted the decision. One anonymous Big 12 athletic director reportedly called it the “lowest point” of his time in college sports, while officials at schools like Georgia and Nebraska discussed refusing to schedule Texas Tech if Sorsby took the field.
The outrage stemmed from one simple fact: Sorsby wasn’t accused of some technical violation. He admitted to placing thousands of wagers totaling roughly $90,000. That made this an open-and-shut case — no ifs, ands, or butts about it.
And from the school’s perspective, if one rogue judge can overrule the NCAA on this, then everything else would be fair game too. The power to enforce rules would be out of the schools, conferences, and the NCAA’s hands and into the hands of local courts. You can see how that could spiral badly.
So where do things stand for Sorsby now? Here’s what we know: the NCAA has denied Texas Tech’s attempts to restore his eligibility. Sorby’s counter-lawsuit against the NCAA was also dropped. The Red Raiders are planning to play 2026 without his services. Womp womp womp.
We hate to say it, but it looks like Sorsby is sh*t out of luck for 2026. His only real option is to wait for the 2027 Draft in April. Most scouts are so-so on his NFL prospects, but he sure has an awful lot of time to prepare himself and prove those scouts wrong — in the training field, that is, because the game-day fields are closed to him this year.
Online betting sites 